Peer Review Process
Transparent editorial screening and double-blind peer review for quality research publication.
Peer Review Process
IJAMRET follows a structured peer-review process to ensure the publication of original, ethical and academically sound research. Submitted manuscripts are first screened by the editorial team and then evaluated by reviewers based on relevance, originality, methodology, clarity and contribution to knowledge.
The journal follows a double-blind peer-review model wherever applicable, where reviewer and author identities are kept confidential during the review process.
Review Workflow
Submission
Author submits manuscript through the online system.
Editorial Screening
Editorial team checks scope, format and basic quality.
Reviewer Assignment
Suitable reviewers are assigned based on subject expertise.
Peer Review
Reviewers evaluate originality, methodology and research value.
Revision
Authors revise the manuscript based on reviewer comments.
Final Decision
Editorial decision is made after review and revision.
Reviewer Evaluation Criteria
Originality
Novel contribution and research relevance.
Methodology
Appropriate research design and analysis.
Results
Clear findings and logical interpretation.
References
Relevant citations and academic support.
Ethics
Compliance with publication ethics.
Clarity
Clear structure, language and presentation.