Reviewer Ethics

IJAMRET expects reviewers to uphold the highest standards of confidentiality, fairness, academic integrity and ethical responsibility during the peer-review process.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, copy, distribute or discuss unpublished manuscript content with anyone outside the editorial process.

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must decline review invitations if they have any personal, academic, financial, institutional or professional conflict that may influence impartial judgment.

Objectivity and Fairness

Review reports should be based on scholarly merit, originality, methodology, relevance and ethical compliance. Personal criticism or biased comments should be avoided.

Constructive Feedback

Reviewers should provide clear, respectful and constructive comments that help authors improve the quality of their manuscripts.

Use of AI Tools in Review

Reviewers must not upload confidential manuscripts to third-party AI tools or platforms. Any use of digital tools must not compromise confidentiality, originality or editorial integrity.

Timeliness

Reviewers should accept assignments only when they can complete the review within the requested timeline.