Reviewer Guidelines
Guidelines for reviewers to support fair, ethical and constructive peer review.
Reviewer Guidelines
IJAMRET values the contribution of reviewers in maintaining the quality, credibility and integrity of scholarly publication. Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive and timely evaluations of submitted manuscripts.
Reviewer Responsibilities
- Evaluate manuscripts fairly and objectively.
- Maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
- Provide constructive comments to improve manuscript quality.
- Declare any conflict of interest before accepting review assignments.
- Submit review reports within the requested timeline.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, copy, discuss or use unpublished manuscript content for personal or professional advantage.
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers should decline review invitations if they have personal, academic, institutional, financial or professional conflicts that may affect impartial judgment.
Constructive Review
Review comments should be clear, respectful, evidence-based and helpful to authors. Personal criticism or inappropriate language should be avoided.
Review Evaluation Criteria
Originality
Does the manuscript present new knowledge or meaningful contribution?
Relevance
Is the topic suitable for the journal’s aim and scope?
Methodology
Is the research method appropriate and clearly explained?
Findings
Are results clearly presented and logically interpreted?
References
Are references current, relevant and properly cited?
Ethics
Does the manuscript follow ethical research and publication standards?
Reviewer Workflow
Invitation
Reviewer receives invitation from the editorial office.
Acceptance
Reviewer confirms availability and absence of conflict of interest.
Evaluation
Manuscript is reviewed according to quality, originality and relevance.
Recommendation
Reviewer submits comments and decision recommendation.